{"id":"W1972569004","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2005.05.019","title":"Economic welfare in delivered pricing duopoly: Bertrand and Cournot","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Zengin Foundation For Studies On Economics And Finance; University of Tokyo; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Ryerson University","keywords":"Cournot competition; Bertrand competition; Economics; Duopoly; Bertrand paradox (economics); Microeconomics; Economic welfare; Welfare; Oligopoly; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003064711,0.0001736085,0.0004288033,0.0003816542,0.00009919326,0.000102206,0.0001634982,0.00006653123,0.001943001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008005803,0.0002366247,0.0001110114,0.00005518031,0.00005239779,0.000328861,0.00004394815,0.0001365551,0.000598543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002858274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000938536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004476701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001388082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985395,0.00001232887,0.0006817549,0.0004603481,0.00001095668,0.0002951185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993997,0.00002911802,0.0002153844,0.0002501585,0.000004259669,0.0001014209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009606144,0.0001664104,0.400123,0.0000546922,0.0003917605,0.0000151804,0.002320334,0.04951262,0.0002440257,0.5310416,0.003788827,0.01224553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006617192,0.00007593485,0.2299222,0.000044047,0.00005015165,0.00004486927,0.0005319695,0.1370769,0.0004946499,0.007557402,0.6153379,0.002246768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9664156,0.0006333767,0.0003841647,0.02270049,0.0002024124,0.0001033091,0.00006217476,0.00002351271,0.009474978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994974,0.0006485616,0.0006181466,0.00333452,0.0001634643,0.00001346097,0.00001857726,0.00002510301,0.0002041317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6115491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009435463185474828,"score_gpt":0.1839922810394679,"score_spread":0.1745568178539931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}