{"id":"W1972569004","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2005.05.019","title":"Economic welfare in delivered pricing duopoly: Bertrand and Cournot","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Zengin Foundation For Studies On Economics And Finance; University of Tokyo; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Ryerson University","keywords":"Cournot competition; Bertrand competition; Economics; Duopoly; Bertrand paradox (economics); Microeconomics; Economic welfare; Welfare; Oligopoly; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004184608,0.001183453,0.002184581,0.001470734,0.001492003,0.005750699,0.001866651,0.00295638,0.005645599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01631176,0.0007243345,0.00112886,0.002092385,0.003881008,0.008258457,0.001675317,0.003440946,0.000352276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004396365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002188385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01111395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006528345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979108,0.001331524,0.00004557862,0.0001708679,0.0002458614,0.0002953211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893602,0.008572803,0.0005726548,0.0003997698,0.0005981469,0.0004963784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001397933,0.000117667,0.0006543097,0.0000995061,0.00004874518,0.0001687965,0.0001851388,0.09703188,0.0003342951,0.89098,0.003076162,0.007163711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004025894,0.00002985551,0.0006407127,0.00002331547,0.00002959198,0.00006191034,0.0001115456,0.2474889,0.00007640891,0.7506099,0.0008615404,0.00002605676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4497449,0.009327301,0.4255497,0.01123071,0.0004819187,0.0001550644,0.0003295713,0.0002294671,0.1029514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799084,0.001779691,0.008267759,0.0003359236,0.0003382578,0.00004964522,0.00006848669,0.00005098452,0.009200866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01111395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03189802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009435463185474828,"score_gpt":0.1839922810394679,"score_spread":0.1745568178539931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}