{"id":"W1972591748","doi":"10.1002/mop.21625","title":"Electromagnetic scattering by arbitrary shaped inhomogeneous impedance cylinder using physical optics method","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Microwave and Optical Technology Letters","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Scattering; Electrical impedance; Cylinder; Impedance parameters; Physics; Microwave; Physical optics; Electromagnetic field; Boundary value problem; Optics; Wave impedance; Inversion (geology); Electric field; Mathematical analysis; Computational physics; Mathematics; Geometry; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000858198,0.0003296517,0.0004235196,0.0001822479,0.0001803412,0.00007750146,0.0002287114,0.0001256251,0.00002681976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003795727,0.0003303494,0.0001399769,0.0003963749,0.0003432712,0.00006061295,0.0001223885,0.0004568335,0.00001258899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002431513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000186234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007478424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001371525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982486,0.0000372942,0.0002996234,0.0005800516,0.0001302499,0.0007041164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994402,0.00007112019,0.00008554922,0.0002961579,0.00002797615,0.00007899886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007054171,0.0001040799,0.002711891,0.000009324057,0.00008387439,0.00001680738,0.00001439599,0.00003147259,0.9860897,0.002591719,0.0001548808,0.00818482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000868329,0.0002432468,0.0005595773,0.0000380149,0.0003870404,0.000153596,0.00009042132,0.02687787,0.9535415,0.01626742,0.0001293451,0.0008436092],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9075872,0.0002465417,0.08880433,0.002660861,0.0000235237,0.0001023506,0.000008050934,0.0001041525,0.0004629664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405177,0.000004039418,0.05858423,0.0005011634,0.0002395431,0.00001732649,0.00002181002,0.00004070882,0.000073543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03293041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004494382265460011,"score_gpt":0.2306557521237556,"score_spread":0.2261613698582956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}