{"id":"W1972591748","doi":"10.1002/mop.21625","title":"Electromagnetic scattering by arbitrary shaped inhomogeneous impedance cylinder using physical optics method","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Microwave and Optical Technology Letters","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Scattering; Electrical impedance; Cylinder; Impedance parameters; Physics; Microwave; Physical optics; Electromagnetic field; Boundary value problem; Optics; Wave impedance; Inversion (geology); Electric field; Mathematical analysis; Computational physics; Mathematics; Geometry; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003586166,0.0005158387,0.0004260218,0.0004695093,0.000240536,0.0006633701,0.0004029421,0.0005429736,0.0007208648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007751162,0.0002295789,0.0004644043,0.0003629179,0.0008513854,0.001051294,0.0006980524,0.0003316642,0.0002006937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003589604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003505332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004943572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003185977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997568,0.00006842917,0.000008607084,0.00003166942,0.0001121756,0.00002236859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997315,0.0001286112,0.00003587511,0.00003673473,0.00005012784,0.00001708578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001699587,0.0000807874,0.001798066,0.0002420334,0.00004381537,0.0008283288,0.0003007946,0.4564707,0.1713613,0.3273929,0.0009863673,0.04032485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001621726,0.00002764909,0.0003336114,0.000005208385,0.000005322155,0.0001642351,0.00003177224,0.9792179,0.005876268,0.01347285,0.0008344778,0.00001448157],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09788105,0.000273695,0.8943065,0.0001519816,0.00005262152,0.00003699573,0.0000249127,0.00008740981,0.00718468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8533922,0.0005277358,0.1408506,0.00005233439,0.00005101049,0.00007858592,0.00006841403,0.00003139963,0.004947769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0007208648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002604425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004494382265460011,"score_gpt":0.2306557521237556,"score_spread":0.2261613698582956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}