{"id":"W1972593542","doi":"10.1139/b00-011","title":"A cladistic analysis of the Old World species of <i>Lotus</i> L. (Fabaceae: Loteae)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Plant Diversity and Evolution","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Warwick","keywords":"Monophyly; Biology; Cladistics; Subgenus; Fabaceae; Polyphyly; Lotus corniculatus; Outgroup; Botany; Genus; Zoology; Clade; Phylogenetics; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001541303,0.00005808643,0.0002090219,0.00006612946,0.0001137893,0.00001420368,0.0002881357,0.00003636659,0.002930679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003438697,0.00002198537,0.0002385504,0.001121435,0.0001243363,0.00007042121,0.00000676797,0.00009905248,0.000004634149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005116192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005974305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008868833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2899447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993541,0.00004587672,0.0002306877,0.00006009806,0.0001566406,0.0001526358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994559,0.00006501952,0.0001793526,0.00004176595,0.00008263463,0.0001753038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001933744,0.0001281096,0.8356176,0.00002106854,0.001369149,0.0001221809,0.001036157,0.001989457,0.0918516,0.001701304,0.04069743,0.02527256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006295852,0.00005907893,0.9393298,0.00003796753,0.000296233,0.00001064039,0.0001701409,0.00005614513,0.000272968,0.00008860206,0.05955828,0.00005720049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946259,0.0002473828,7.648088e-7,0.001005294,0.00008821258,0.00002758853,0.0002550961,0.000001257579,0.003748561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967308,0.00004534439,0.000008844267,0.000137742,0.00006257027,5.933965e-8,0.000002911061,2.61326e-7,0.003011489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2810759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01257392790924633,"score_gpt":0.1590520589193932,"score_spread":0.1464781310101469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}