{"id":"W1972783418","doi":"10.1097/00019501-200402000-00005","title":"Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and cost-benefit","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Coronary Artery Disease","topic":"Pain Management and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse; Karolinska Institutet; Medtronic","keywords":"Medicine; Angina; Coronary artery disease; Refractory (planetary science); Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Spinal cord stimulation; Medical record; Retrospective cohort study; Quality of life (healthcare); Internal medicine; Surgery; Anesthesia; Cardiology; Stimulation; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002372756,0.0003057492,0.0008095156,0.002209607,0.0003256335,0.0008437178,0.000371565,0.0005894672,0.001682811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008992527,0.0003108943,0.001909212,0.003285104,0.0004639633,0.0004507141,0.0004003387,0.0004375266,0.0002538496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001349623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006855152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003154876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002655664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972172,0.0009526015,0.0006986475,0.0003026314,0.000650885,0.0001780247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871884,0.004693235,0.006168524,0.0004803357,0.0009964824,0.0004728815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001394118,0.00007277518,0.9909497,0.0001899699,0.0009696235,0.0004206616,0.00007315589,0.0002037961,0.0001279231,0.00005771894,0.000251439,0.005289335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003014156,0.001357417,0.9919985,0.0001590027,0.001113285,0.003061694,0.0002162848,0.0007255369,0.0001532538,0.00009147915,0.0007914004,0.00003072962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918755,0.00616378,0.0001941192,0.00009476815,0.000008985265,0.00008831854,0.001019415,0.000003955638,0.0005512867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997887,0.001066383,0.0001044312,0.00005635545,0.0000262335,0.00004986311,0.0007611592,0.000002717586,0.00004589191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003154876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01254851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02229142634063771,"score_gpt":0.3049932141225902,"score_spread":0.2827017877819525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}