{"id":"W1972783418","doi":"10.1097/00019501-200402000-00005","title":"Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and cost-benefit","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Coronary Artery Disease","topic":"Pain Management and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse; Karolinska Institutet; Medtronic","keywords":"Medicine; Angina; Coronary artery disease; Refractory (planetary science); Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Spinal cord stimulation; Medical record; Retrospective cohort study; Quality of life (healthcare); Internal medicine; Surgery; Anesthesia; Cardiology; Stimulation; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007212981,0.0001382585,0.0002949223,0.0002438959,0.00006620057,0.0000092553,0.00003558643,0.00002783489,0.00003867758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043656,0.000127122,0.0001567741,0.0002677647,0.00005730167,0.0001072164,0.00002090068,0.00004086403,0.000003692016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001859696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004330238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006452465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005455213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991946,0.0000132589,0.0001812458,0.0002864136,0.0001696739,0.0001547591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993347,0.00004335394,0.00008936278,0.0002575588,0.0000837116,0.0001912923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01432906,0.002107833,0.9571521,0.0001792157,0.002671347,0.0002342941,0.0001459473,0.0005748251,0.000228041,0.001303418,0.0001138346,0.02096005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005358225,0.002123555,0.9847497,0.00007604506,0.005542054,0.000001732893,0.00003894163,0.001118999,0.00001189764,0.0006755707,0.0001944907,0.0001088175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958957,0.0007653572,0.001768569,0.0002322285,0.00005014226,0.001037536,0.00008332505,0.00004353771,0.0001235878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988301,0.00005728697,0.0002943542,0.0000977954,0.00005742665,0.00008135034,0.0003546668,0.00001281927,0.0002141837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02759753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5183885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02229142634063771,"score_gpt":0.3049932141225902,"score_spread":0.2827017877819525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}