{"id":"W1972801043","doi":"10.4141/a99-096","title":"Dealing with antimicrobial resistance – the Danish experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antibiotic resistance; Veterinary Drugs; Medical prescription; Enterococcus faecium; Antimicrobial; Biotechnology; Consumption (sociology); Business; European commission; Promotion (chess); Medicine; Veterinary medicine; European union; Political science; Antibiotics; Biology; Pharmacology; Microbiology; Law; International trade; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003867887,0.000100013,0.0000941918,0.00003003152,0.0006267788,0.000136188,0.0007528409,0.00001898347,0.003768462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003081099,0.00005963191,0.00003295324,0.0004201614,0.002808229,0.0006376143,0.00002621903,0.0001715156,0.0001199353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001899889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001643041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001210977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003383678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987519,0.0000184469,0.000182906,0.0001780231,0.0003903822,0.0004783086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989967,0.00001912968,0.0000793353,0.0001337086,0.00001048765,0.0007606145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001983144,0.0000443435,0.05581236,0.000004924751,0.000008564502,0.0005875708,0.002548524,0.001060988,0.9261777,0.0005444767,0.002035874,0.01097633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005640279,0.0005468648,0.7733989,0.0001692581,0.00003003961,0.001235494,0.0005438094,0.0002179391,0.1137787,0.0001840431,0.1088466,0.0004842619],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710799,0.0000457219,0.00001906261,0.001428341,0.00004991168,0.00005334169,0.000002875452,0.000002940838,0.02731792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977872,0.00002396961,0.0007672876,0.001113899,0.00003903122,1.750154e-7,6.612918e-8,0.000005686435,0.0002626796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.812399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01709815126098397,"score_gpt":0.248954497772508,"score_spread":0.2318563465115241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}