{"id":"W1972852316","doi":"10.1071/sb04031","title":"Phylogenetic analysis of the Australian Salicornioideae (Chenopodiaceae) based on morphology and nuclear DNA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Systematic Botany","topic":"Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines; Minerals and Energy Research Institute of Western Australia","keywords":"Biology; Monophyly; Subspecies; Plant taxonomy; Tribe; Molecular phylogenetics; Phylogenetic tree; Botany; Sister group; Systematics; Clade; Zoology; Taxonomy (biology); Evolutionary biology; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001437798,0.0001559657,0.0001377066,0.0008795501,0.0003552974,0.0002189113,0.0001069763,0.0001127083,0.0006727845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003672965,0.00007381048,0.0001560026,0.0007602423,0.0001737601,0.0001038009,0.0003221467,0.000201932,0.0001475382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003297347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002245187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01933302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999174,0.00001900471,0.000005766492,0.00002278515,0.00002173028,0.00001337295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998749,0.00002355777,0.00002847459,0.00001157439,0.0000299201,0.00003148851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006031662,0.00007691358,0.4196168,0.0004070506,0.000184595,0.0004957513,0.003375648,0.001230386,0.4667565,0.0007285426,0.0002590477,0.1062655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009184687,0.0000766062,0.9935436,0.00001956284,0.00003176307,0.0001940446,0.0003822983,0.001186111,0.001587252,0.00008378195,0.002879592,0.000006184936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984558,0.0003103201,0.0002949554,0.00002233535,0.000001204731,0.00001221622,0.0001110262,0.000005927577,0.0007862406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975866,0.0002070662,0.001081634,0.00001532557,0.000001241186,0.000009390759,0.0005567424,0.000002176293,0.0005399489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01490796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0242779653921218,"score_gpt":0.2226972428905991,"score_spread":0.1984192774984773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}