{"id":"W1972870526","doi":"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.019","title":"An evaluation of surfactant foam technology in remediation of contaminated soil","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemosphere","topic":"Environmental remediation with nanomaterials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental remediation; Bioremediation; Soil remediation; Pulmonary surfactant; Environmental science; Process (computing); Contamination; Biochemical engineering; Waste management; Soil contamination; Process engineering; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Soil water; Business; Chemical engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003081869,0.00007483603,0.0001604504,0.00003566814,0.000005047616,0.000002021691,0.00007905984,0.0001212482,0.0001101478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007491621,0.00008105987,0.00001351188,0.0002086717,0.00003794473,0.0001060289,0.000008156222,0.00004178499,0.000006407492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002381089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003050976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002227701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006585507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992681,0.00001738115,0.0003097346,0.00009257877,0.0002186251,0.0000936275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996621,0.00001089844,0.00008778233,0.0001716637,0.00004815686,0.00001940449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005667308,0.00004585237,0.009628689,0.00004000758,0.000006426287,3.85284e-7,0.0001635969,0.0813176,0.9054416,0.00003984024,0.000002288004,0.003308052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001130658,0.00003911445,0.04381678,0.0000367351,0.00001226735,5.728621e-7,0.0001822096,0.006458896,0.9473491,0.0009041159,0.000003481386,0.00006606194],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989761,0.0001853619,0.0001599936,0.00002263753,0.00009845372,0.0002169723,0.000005822683,0.0000554629,0.0002791725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991291,0.00003849464,0.0007571795,0.000002153485,0.000008471397,0.00001760889,0.00002983409,0.00001502902,0.000002113472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0748587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3305526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009148457888201868,"score_gpt":0.2278320110549406,"score_spread":0.2186835531667387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}