{"id":"W1972895171","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.11.004","title":"Dynamic risk assessment: A validation study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive power; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Predictive validity; Criminal justice; Recidivism; Risk assessment; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Power (physics); Criminology; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01426072,0.001033184,0.0009415388,0.001489374,0.001676785,0.001574091,0.00171203,0.001332236,0.003700996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05522157,0.00068674,0.001138103,0.0006114438,0.001570302,0.00185274,0.002169725,0.00170161,0.001677864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001096882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001781617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003201733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002776769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941147,0.002770174,0.00061638,0.0009503514,0.001332031,0.000216449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9347477,0.03905937,0.00341358,0.01214592,0.009500029,0.001133469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0251701,0.0720948,0.6322662,0.000508048,0.0008641736,0.001053694,0.01589936,0.009640636,0.01266538,0.003563151,0.003580392,0.222694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01078339,0.07169272,0.8324825,0.0003552661,0.001312689,0.003034769,0.005423863,0.04522723,0.01106028,0.004935977,0.01332258,0.0003686834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991643,0.00006105303,0.004146278,0.00004535021,0.00003059213,0.001455494,0.0002443761,0.0000583691,0.002315519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879139,0.0001055194,0.007347109,0.00008196249,0.00002579615,0.001599227,0.0008414746,0.00005278912,0.002032176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01426072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07541883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04245200861235154,"score_gpt":0.4071186419184263,"score_spread":0.3646666333060748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}