{"id":"W1972895171","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.11.004","title":"Dynamic risk assessment: A validation study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive power; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Predictive validity; Criminal justice; Recidivism; Risk assessment; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Power (physics); Criminology; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002385701,0.0002545495,0.0004106138,0.0003816029,0.0001823703,0.00006406111,0.0004014888,0.0001081697,0.0004597929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002535976,0.0002222022,0.0001715802,0.0002875885,0.00005966023,0.0006578416,0.00004614525,0.0008111146,0.0002022853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000193345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007211547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003033925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005798184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970143,0.0006417561,0.0009022024,0.0002115916,0.0006769016,0.0005532028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972656,0.0003726467,0.001364252,0.0004002062,0.0002756041,0.0003217094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005082561,0.02689157,0.4283486,0.0007309369,0.0036911,0.0009100818,0.1759211,0.000350451,0.00370346,0.01179412,0.2308276,0.1117484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004249709,0.003695822,0.8020937,0.0001050516,0.01111471,0.001934711,0.1708443,0.0001335597,0.00003003584,0.0004570296,0.004826763,0.0005145589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8603877,0.000688062,0.007121613,0.0001074872,0.11795,0.0002148264,0.00000852619,0.00002647898,0.01349532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908501,0.0000241028,0.005315176,0.0001670361,0.00333891,0.000006802024,0.000002647225,0.00004418298,0.000251063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3737452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9061144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04245200861235154,"score_gpt":0.4071186419184263,"score_spread":0.3646666333060748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}