{"id":"W1972924322","doi":"10.1145/1385569.1385603","title":"An empirical evaluation of interactive visualizations for preferential choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Visualization; Empirical research; Process (computing); Outcome (game theory); Choice set; Interactive visualization; Human–computer interaction; Measure (data warehouse); Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023922,0.00005551372,0.0000824231,0.00009267731,0.00008089582,0.00003453786,0.0003075293,0.0000275456,0.0001056115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002095538,0.00004934233,0.00003449415,0.0002701708,0.0000247125,0.0007162729,0.00004508497,0.00002182164,0.000006307643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002202371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001388843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001113599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002347061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991366,0.0000930109,0.0001882051,0.0001830021,0.0003190872,0.00008006809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988617,0.00008070511,0.00008073088,0.0002607558,0.0006671139,0.0000490121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000766525,0.006850919,0.04756149,0.0001032961,0.0003524712,0.00000109887,0.01839813,0.01694367,0.008660443,0.7226979,0.1044474,0.07390661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004344449,0.00009550498,0.005668401,0.000003617281,0.00001826228,0.000001397017,0.0000335536,0.9867349,0.003863866,0.000769425,0.002309811,0.00006682904],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02582585,0.000003395275,0.9725204,0.00008648229,0.0001044419,0.0001802704,0.00001139811,0.00005470394,0.001213096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832609,0.000002909521,0.01615604,0.0002091057,0.00004414454,0.00001640747,0.0001320813,0.00000435755,0.0001740207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2012122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1749196764614371,"score_gpt":0.4778877704673096,"score_spread":0.3029680940058725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}