{"id":"W1972986968","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.011","title":"The pipeline and the porcupine: alternate metaphors of the physician–industry relationship","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Calgary","keywords":"Pipeline (software); Ethnography; Drug industry; Set (abstract data type); Porcupine; Sociology; Public relations; Marketing; Business; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006715561,0.000772094,0.0005721914,0.002729488,0.007771839,0.01257426,0.00187922,0.01073729,0.009989052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01372437,0.0005268877,0.0007631487,0.00273848,0.04639316,0.01934142,0.005970981,0.009708962,0.001140536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004970469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004281825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00585102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004525935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908637,0.007082814,0.0001386496,0.000475247,0.0008607955,0.0005787474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900107,0.007391837,0.0007119794,0.0004715733,0.0005615953,0.0008522114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003111916,0.00001701082,0.00008145786,0.00002671419,0.00000255037,0.000142473,0.02305118,0.00005393373,0.00007140529,0.9716438,0.003430529,0.001447781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001633558,0.00009862759,0.0004296681,0.0001969733,0.00001913784,0.001074615,0.04656544,0.001501702,0.0002182501,0.6698614,0.2798256,0.00004537568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04169212,0.009114257,0.05801954,0.2110288,0.002256941,0.0001175188,0.0001363476,0.0001538701,0.6774805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.942732,0.002562622,0.009005709,0.01549005,0.001377421,0.0001599947,0.00004633061,0.0001982802,0.02842749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03606349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3014599231998074,"score_gpt":0.541572921383349,"score_spread":0.2401129981835416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}