{"id":"W1972994782","doi":"10.1115/pvp2012-78236","title":"Calculation of Stress Intensity Factor for Surface Flaws Using Universal Weight Functions With Piece-Wise Cubic Stress Interpolation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Volume 1: Codes and Standards","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kinectrics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Stress intensity factor; Interpolation (computer graphics); Weight function; Stress (linguistics); Linear interpolation; Mathematics; Polynomial; Cubic function; Mathematical analysis; Function (biology); Polynomial interpolation; Geometry; Structural engineering; Applied mathematics; Fracture mechanics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002290233,0.001148253,0.0007122658,0.001913341,0.0004381865,0.0008733731,0.002058504,0.0008201826,0.005364005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01022958,0.0004618013,0.0009115331,0.00211078,0.0004527809,0.001740993,0.0009703624,0.001108971,0.001853819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009217914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001730875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003439707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005453969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978716,0.0002156552,0.0001407393,0.0001731369,0.001513122,0.00008572805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948119,0.001213679,0.0003465244,0.001049413,0.00253507,0.00004342067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002266361,0.0002219232,0.005761337,0.0006194783,0.00008014481,0.0001540411,0.0004915621,0.1587521,0.06509732,0.04969824,0.008523543,0.7103736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003097677,0.0001815124,0.003695489,0.00007846976,0.00002374908,0.0002985957,0.00006712438,0.8810017,0.09050135,0.009003148,0.01502356,0.00009439884],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112034,0.00006608641,0.9829678,0.00002547088,0.00004594861,0.00009254261,0.0001185206,0.00221971,0.00326058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1464085,0.000222656,0.8478308,0.00003165285,0.00001251256,0.0001761586,0.0005591685,0.0009795072,0.003778925],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005364005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0179444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01378107908822428,"score_gpt":0.2311090175172371,"score_spread":0.2173279384290128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}