{"id":"W1973102016","doi":"10.3758/pbr.15.4.866","title":"On finding negative priming from distractors","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke","keywords":"Negative priming; Psychology; Phenomenon; Priming (agriculture); Cognitive psychology; Set (abstract data type); Mechanism (biology); Inhibition of return; Variety (cybernetics); Control (management); Selective attention; Social psychology; Cognition; Visual attention; Neuroscience; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003061956,0.0009630779,0.0007289349,0.001174712,0.0005135324,0.0007767732,0.001033358,0.001494629,0.006162733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006925957,0.0002602477,0.0005188746,0.0005944677,0.001701528,0.001507443,0.00103104,0.001400551,0.002393373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003336564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003795287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003397799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003222791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992598,0.0001405125,0.00007105862,0.0002797366,0.000187514,0.0000613502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923746,0.005573313,0.000356343,0.0008854988,0.0006415796,0.0001686789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003939794,0.0004469716,0.01507393,0.005437564,0.0003496182,0.004209119,0.0009764624,0.0001242781,0.5074752,0.009425404,0.007809248,0.4447325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003895369,0.002928546,0.1771933,0.002701435,0.002359935,0.03715866,0.001533301,0.000835533,0.6238003,0.04792182,0.1029486,0.0002290675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.731924,0.1188648,0.03407096,0.008874068,0.005027916,0.0005156895,0.0005635595,0.0005225085,0.09963646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9047997,0.0563388,0.01278514,0.01063035,0.002857592,0.0002732047,0.0006601108,0.0003045465,0.01135055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006162733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02061641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2444749778009437,"score_gpt":0.3870046129437151,"score_spread":0.1425296351427714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}