{"id":"W1973110349","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.003","title":"A prospective, double-blind comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of patients presenting with shoulder pain","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","topic":"Shoulder Injury and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Arthroscopy; Concordance; Acromioclavicular joint; Radiology; Bankart lesion; Tears; Population; Shoulder joint; Biceps; Acromion; Rotator cuff; Surgery; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001937683,0.0001428635,0.0004969961,0.0002349975,0.00005429833,0.00002107049,0.00004344117,0.00004795994,0.00001146802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000134219,0.0000862231,0.00007165927,0.0002654316,0.000149378,0.0001902109,0.00001644752,0.0002288708,5.255571e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004762154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001725268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002830213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001846503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980697,0.0001606142,0.0006510032,0.0001532897,0.0007942736,0.0001711264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998684,0.0002800026,0.0004024702,0.000135551,0.0004389044,0.00005905815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002670183,0.0008327465,0.9752539,0.0001072572,0.00004605577,0.00002199344,0.002375628,0.00009812893,0.0001101209,0.00001512294,0.00006754832,0.01840136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0124543,0.0006129352,0.9797144,0.0004093817,0.0004957633,0.00009056165,0.001410687,0.0002796129,0.004089547,0.0003039461,0.0000529417,0.00008593973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886292,0.009953722,0.00009496838,0.0005455045,0.00005851164,0.0005523565,0.000002399448,0.000002797931,0.0001605931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993767,0.0001804392,0.0002967705,0.00006585835,0.00004405846,0.00001530825,0.000003322331,0.00001217731,0.000005342081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01831542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3516076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06285744763963838,"score_gpt":0.3620286114827289,"score_spread":0.2991711638430905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}