{"id":"W1973153382","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.07.007","title":"The relative and absolute risks of disadvantaged family background and low levels of school resources on student literacy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics of Education Review","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Demographic economics; Literacy; Population; Demography; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005841414,0.0002103126,0.001346233,0.002715847,0.000225035,0.00151038,0.0003716261,0.001082246,0.002685807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03475303,0.0003145843,0.001060779,0.002742478,0.0007942088,0.0007575531,0.0006442739,0.001135957,0.0002102657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001006955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001239693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003783221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008132259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951321,0.003343234,0.0002839309,0.0002248797,0.0008186516,0.000197232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501105,0.04338801,0.003537055,0.0004312308,0.001916825,0.0006163321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005177308,0.000232546,0.4150678,0.02752142,0.02112719,0.001287532,0.0006429073,0.003725355,0.0007565783,0.03971032,0.01838961,0.4663614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003967811,0.001501566,0.8456954,0.01199177,0.02228041,0.002652777,0.001581308,0.001491519,0.0007925382,0.03537558,0.07613069,0.0001095737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1414602,0.834708,0.0008001057,0.01015853,0.0006248546,0.00002982408,0.0007429602,0.000007317653,0.01146822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5537648,0.4420547,0.0003284587,0.000983209,0.001447506,0.00003048738,0.0002779587,0.000005445139,0.00110743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005841414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03089273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09496019551428941,"score_gpt":0.4360053554505581,"score_spread":0.3410451599362687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}