{"id":"W1973212692","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2012.650578","title":"Assessment of the quality and toxicity of the discharges of a wastewater treatment plant and alternatives to improve its operation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A","topic":"Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; University of California, Santa Cruz","keywords":"Effluent; Wastewater; Sewage treatment; Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Pollution; Pulp and paper industry; Waste management; Environmental engineering; Chemistry; Engineering; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007182105,0.0003795131,0.0003406462,0.0006129874,0.0002838352,0.0007885378,0.0002081429,0.0007145287,0.0006382521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006597099,0.0001194238,0.0003701577,0.0004720741,0.000206086,0.00030224,0.0002233063,0.0002911857,0.0002096757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004750551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004786699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001787812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002549034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993754,0.0001123554,0.00004197705,0.00007785896,0.0003435665,0.00004884166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993616,0.000103407,0.0002110884,0.00004234792,0.0002465067,0.00003507801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002745606,0.0002724504,0.0432807,0.0002896905,0.00005231731,0.0001112234,0.00007692999,0.001718985,0.9266593,0.00007118228,0.00006712865,0.02712559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001410251,0.005667449,0.1868858,0.00004471316,0.00013997,0.0002970708,0.0003715198,0.003153675,0.8000183,0.0001591581,0.003217126,0.00003115118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996336,0.0005748557,0.002097532,0.00004379166,0.000006266047,0.00003860685,0.0001745639,0.00001905837,0.0007093255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933329,0.0007766428,0.003931914,0.00003565683,0.000006928752,0.00002234073,0.00041139,0.000007573091,0.001474639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001787812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003798306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06530690450952148,"score_gpt":0.3692713251240081,"score_spread":0.3039644206144866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}