{"id":"W1973219179","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.021","title":"Interior point models for power system stability problems","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Electric power system; Mathematical optimization; Power flow; Voltage; Nonlinear programming; Stability (learning theory); AC power; Computer science; Control theory (sociology); Interior point method; Point (geometry); Nonlinear system; Power (physics); Optimal control; Power-flow study; Optimization problem; Operating point; Mathematics; Control (management); Engineering; Electronic engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001680533,0.001736223,0.002333145,0.0009519664,0.0005812445,0.002065329,0.001782929,0.001611137,0.007640901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004941217,0.000885545,0.00141446,0.001377186,0.001956617,0.002515638,0.001780469,0.003844941,0.001109662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00112486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009555116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002982036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002449761,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991193,0.000587866,0.00001917136,0.00006735499,0.0001421185,0.00006422745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981838,0.001295419,0.0001453135,0.00008591416,0.0001839123,0.0001055647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004057689,0.00003815853,0.00009851241,0.0000752064,0.00003017702,0.00003485442,0.00007694766,0.6211252,0.0002702182,0.3674935,0.002560857,0.008155711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001148182,0.00001209797,0.00001441862,0.000009119713,0.000005349538,0.000005799486,0.000009425728,0.8335797,0.00004226672,0.1653615,0.0009446496,0.000004282982],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006103401,0.0007484347,0.9822311,0.0003757279,0.0000819449,0.00002220785,0.00007715819,0.00009810092,0.010262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7354076,0.00366464,0.2168311,0.0003113258,0.0004714995,0.0005155223,0.0005927689,0.0005102744,0.04169529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007640901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02556133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07792103543326995,"score_gpt":0.3141030318449111,"score_spread":0.2361819964116412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}