{"id":"W1973314203","doi":"10.1115/1.1449489","title":"On Assessing the Quality of Particle Tracking Through Computational Fluid Dynamic Models","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering","topic":"Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Polygon mesh; Lagrangian particle tracking; Computational fluid dynamics; Mechanics; Finite element method; Tracking (education); Particle (ecology); Domain (mathematical analysis); Conservation of mass; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Geometry; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005900025,0.00009447637,0.0002881147,0.00005490884,0.00003750004,0.00001977713,0.00009402636,0.00005839802,0.0000212817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001503853,0.00006330034,0.0001570037,0.0001871457,0.00001953385,0.0001539283,0.00001153795,0.0002699893,0.000001694411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008192127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000188658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003568704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.434911e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987372,0.00003842915,0.0005637534,0.00008199384,0.0004280542,0.0001505808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991354,0.0003568574,0.0001915707,0.0001263739,0.0001178136,0.00007203683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007826163,0.0004220788,0.00004083881,0.000118752,0.0002249938,0.00003282862,0.0005769394,0.4831518,0.4789343,0.01680799,0.00001812002,0.01959309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008222581,0.0002206107,0.0005882946,0.0002552769,0.0000259418,0.0000889921,0.00005697395,0.9849123,0.01047358,0.002469889,0.00001983357,0.00006599493],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6372707,0.000221977,0.36173,0.0005024977,0.0001897304,0.00003890282,0.000001059057,0.00001316783,0.00003186742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927164,0.00004283008,0.00703761,0.00006657812,0.0001064028,7.683993e-7,5.046511e-7,0.00001552813,0.00001335645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5017605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2581313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07018775834273912,"score_gpt":0.3555330728000376,"score_spread":0.2853453144572985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}