{"id":"W1973314203","doi":"10.1115/1.1449489","title":"On Assessing the Quality of Particle Tracking Through Computational Fluid Dynamic Models","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering","topic":"Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Polygon mesh; Lagrangian particle tracking; Computational fluid dynamics; Mechanics; Finite element method; Tracking (education); Particle (ecology); Domain (mathematical analysis); Conservation of mass; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Geometry; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006010209,0.001312056,0.001279974,0.001881829,0.000789354,0.003637418,0.001354869,0.002327293,0.001138637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03192195,0.0008164365,0.0008608124,0.001324199,0.001513305,0.002326485,0.001563003,0.001395457,0.0002932269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001095635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001592049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01240548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007655351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980441,0.0006957665,0.0001619614,0.0002450258,0.0007399767,0.00011313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862977,0.009846594,0.001251865,0.001247636,0.001223253,0.0001329666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001849186,0.00007954963,0.007701554,0.0002039983,0.00007705612,0.00008884937,0.000234931,0.9370505,0.009892047,0.005908519,0.0002705767,0.03830754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007865137,0.00003982884,0.001190715,0.00003688754,0.00001131875,0.00002891542,0.00002748663,0.9925884,0.003762844,0.001809915,0.0004670801,0.00002866489],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.15085,0.0009176242,0.841986,0.0005275678,0.00007887564,0.0002459725,0.0004015344,0.001408587,0.003583925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6797829,0.001191717,0.3161903,0.000159368,0.0000461288,0.0002386385,0.0005914631,0.0004502834,0.001349295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01240548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03178537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07018775834273912,"score_gpt":0.3555330728000376,"score_spread":0.2853453144572985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}