{"id":"W1973426926","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00624.x","title":"Quantifying the impact of survivor treatment bias in observational studies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","keywords":"Observational study; Medicine; Hazard ratio; Treatment effect; Proportional hazards model; Survival analysis; Average treatment effect; Intensive care medicine; Emergency medicine; Confidence interval; Propensity score matching; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03031873,0.0001186966,0.0005075907,0.0001497919,0.0000295687,0.00001556084,0.0001424116,0.0000871412,0.00007224886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1798291,0.00006748438,0.0002209642,0.0003228351,0.00008725508,0.0009312765,0.00003075972,0.0004524661,0.000003354924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006593464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004701009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006504916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004463957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941126,0.002245049,0.002605479,0.0001194666,0.000787131,0.0001302697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9352709,0.05962507,0.002969754,0.0002338504,0.00186256,0.00003784076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003309982,0.01166599,0.6019461,0.0001051151,0.001854334,0.00005815634,0.009225696,0.06890342,0.0006401169,0.04624615,0.005692588,0.2503523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005640645,0.00401861,0.5681347,0.0008050358,0.0006488147,0.000129323,0.005014771,0.02907852,0.0005509962,0.3840368,0.001622182,0.000319655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991334,0.0008536286,0.00152951,0.005225922,0.0001522334,0.0004119614,0.000002144407,0.000007717656,0.0004829488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300108,0.001261746,0.06838429,0.0001082644,0.0001952385,0.00001533313,6.992246e-7,0.000009306039,0.00001435523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3377907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9136852754774484,"score_gpt":0.7239443433973133,"score_spread":0.1897409320801351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}