{"id":"W1973480827","doi":"10.1139/f03-152","title":"Folly and fantasy in the analysis of spatial catch rate data","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":323,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Population; Spatial distribution; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Statistics; Environmental science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Demography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002024028,0.00005721206,0.0001650596,0.0001376754,0.0001655281,0.0001330101,0.0004802905,0.00001960962,0.001008804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000411645,0.00003546886,0.00002127026,0.0008474049,0.001016978,0.0003265896,0.00004319082,0.00008396728,4.349765e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001585771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001918489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07098752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3981615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990808,0.0001328186,0.0002281843,0.0001324797,0.000235827,0.0001899254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994231,0.0001631767,0.00009842688,0.0001583479,0.000006433042,0.0001505235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002860004,0.000004899725,0.9792255,0.000002367821,0.00002017374,0.00001610806,0.001065575,0.00001349212,0.00001384872,0.0001156442,0.0004916741,0.01902789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001924458,0.0001983572,0.9533966,0.000007369202,0.00009261182,0.00003805337,0.004439541,0.004364174,0.00001699363,0.0009287676,0.03622115,0.0001039336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715981,0.000105524,0.00008720936,0.001643998,0.00004115651,0.00005326834,0.000007767259,3.209412e-7,0.02646268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993022,0.00009937773,0.0003510177,0.0001577572,0.000007128766,5.066994e-7,0.000001123842,0.000001415601,0.00007943503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.327174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03802207915927576,"score_gpt":0.2601393385228799,"score_spread":0.2221172593636042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}