{"id":"W1973530239","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2006.08.015","title":"Local knowledge assessment for a small-scale fishery using geographic information systems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries Research","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Scale (ratio); Fisheries management; Fisheries science; Spiny lobster; Marine protected area; Resource (disambiguation); Data collection; Geography; Conch; Geographic information system; Plan (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Computer science; Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Remote sensing; Cartography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003798046,0.0003347956,0.0006378256,0.007643946,0.001325537,0.002522966,0.0008900453,0.0008307319,0.002883642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01732565,0.0002526105,0.0006738295,0.00403153,0.000497291,0.004677385,0.002047417,0.0003989027,0.0003021501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002288189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004005544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04906435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0666448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986838,0.0004457141,0.000211874,0.0001925263,0.0003837355,0.00008234604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895191,0.006434153,0.0009707636,0.000542313,0.002135995,0.0003975252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001304371,0.0008236336,0.3723875,0.0007481161,0.0007366427,0.00075369,0.001872694,0.07567672,0.005616512,0.007004165,0.004863651,0.5282123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002041747,0.0009877259,0.2056482,0.0003080309,0.001311605,0.0003201042,0.00915651,0.749436,0.007673067,0.01977559,0.005020412,0.0001585314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.885456,0.000791417,0.09972971,0.001263935,0.00002148037,0.0006471698,0.003447756,0.0004277762,0.008214709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377968,0.0002409647,0.05948978,0.00003574248,0.000009820121,0.0002020784,0.001502031,0.00001031296,0.0007124878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04906435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09755749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0521950592666462,"score_gpt":0.3260061303111976,"score_spread":0.2738110710445514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}