{"id":"W1973540500","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2014.953661","title":"The Ecological Validity of Parent-Child Observations: A Review of Empirical Evidence Related to Custody Evaluations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Psychology; Empirical evidence; Best practice; Ecological validity; Criminology; Psychiatry; Cognition; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02685641,0.001140956,0.002762258,0.0104033,0.001128478,0.003645801,0.002693794,0.002032863,0.002481874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09815793,0.001097404,0.001537855,0.01205986,0.00454255,0.004170531,0.002183781,0.00242638,0.0005174113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004004344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01160039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01279047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01852668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9805918,0.01003915,0.003031571,0.001468844,0.004624484,0.0002441161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8383722,0.1407656,0.009640662,0.002075324,0.008626107,0.0005200445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001085115,0.00009298449,0.008098458,0.1144677,0.0006717921,0.0002692656,0.002610393,0.0002019509,0.0001362238,0.004726253,0.00585241,0.862764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081436,0.0003870085,0.07712338,0.5936202,0.003477752,0.004757801,0.01007382,0.0003777695,0.0007224294,0.009831811,0.2993359,0.0002106173],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004663523,0.9983855,0.0001728352,0.000402898,0.00005703888,0.00001618043,0.00002251217,0.000002722156,0.0004739079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004771583,0.9943141,0.0005590515,0.0001875824,0.00005874054,0.00003227215,0.00003204386,0.000003249753,0.00004149821],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.142032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2368209909179605,"score_gpt":0.4733131804116628,"score_spread":0.2364921894937023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}