{"id":"W1973622722","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2010.08.006","title":"Urban agglomeration, wages and selection: Evidence from samples of siblings","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour Economics","topic":"Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economies of agglomeration; Wage; Economics; Residence; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fixed effects model; Instrumental variable; Population; Regression; Panel data; Regression analysis; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Geography; Statistics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002427436,0.0002642897,0.0005745304,0.0009184167,0.001490855,0.0008763583,0.001027325,0.0005115697,0.003747982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01319401,0.0003860704,0.0004614567,0.002592518,0.001791377,0.0007069306,0.001509712,0.0004524181,0.0005985416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004658916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004527641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03066567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04096331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975077,0.001247805,0.0001344166,0.0004640168,0.0003925044,0.0002535997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903966,0.003723428,0.00249045,0.001565095,0.0009450631,0.0008792671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004494025,0.0002300774,0.9907991,0.00001548825,0.0002415513,0.0001697266,0.003295003,0.0001521791,0.0003018041,0.0003929074,0.0003455179,0.003607216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005215222,0.0002231389,0.9932278,0.000008168816,0.0001150236,0.0002615411,0.004406873,0.0003265008,0.0002338114,0.0004421237,0.0006941332,0.000008571515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999584,0.00004682097,0.00008532861,0.00001556316,0.000001004675,0.00000450021,0.00007701324,7.07544e-7,0.0001852188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991259,0.00005958194,0.00008447386,0.0000207437,0.000003637303,0.000008185179,0.0003296444,0.000002879685,0.0003649239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03066567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06097436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02851764084707255,"score_gpt":0.2094872968842475,"score_spread":0.1809696560371749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}