{"id":"W1973624853","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00103.x","title":"The Human Subjects Trade: Ethical and Legal Issues Surrounding Recruitment Incentives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Duty of care; Statute; Business; Tort; Political science; Safeguarding; Incentive; Enforcement; Law and economics; Duty; Law; Public relations; Liability; Medicine; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3746155,0.0008041629,0.001497381,0.001795672,0.01216108,0.01687599,0.004932751,0.05733116,0.005104844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4297459,0.001643892,0.001321115,0.002606651,0.04387241,0.01360679,0.007247969,0.02987843,0.002567618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005206164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01894516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002488687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003974625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6430912,0.2851698,0.01299175,0.01138883,0.04188025,0.00547829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3073286,0.6287544,0.01875157,0.02398848,0.01444132,0.006735707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002285891,0.000199637,0.004605229,0.0003483265,0.00006884848,0.001657389,0.01345254,0.0004403079,0.0007735644,0.7998487,0.1140355,0.06434134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000353069,0.0004604343,0.004922478,0.002848649,0.0001066466,0.003981077,0.007841152,0.003797199,0.001457401,0.5288709,0.4450982,0.0002627888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01271919,0.008471112,0.03183936,0.8738735,0.00488027,0.000489555,0.00006577058,0.0001276231,0.06753366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2389961,0.003811972,0.03537674,0.6855467,0.0150931,0.002298915,0.00006032735,0.0001535397,0.01866262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6253844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7712104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7509528946360123,"score_gpt":0.645536590896026,"score_spread":0.1054163037399863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}