{"id":"W1973671232","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765156","title":"Pipeline risk assessment and risk acceptance criteria in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Pipeline (software); Pipeline transport; Gas pipeline; Environmental planning; Environmental risk assessment; Business; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Computer security; Petroleum engineering; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101612,0.0002820004,0.0004186109,0.000170929,0.0001077529,0.0001794092,0.0001754796,0.00009923529,0.00006086683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005021369,0.0001768066,0.0001196606,0.0004250749,0.0001340903,0.0003185156,0.00004578391,0.000609095,5.557104e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007006963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006941444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002043829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983436,0.0002985059,0.0004860845,0.0002547718,0.0002898285,0.0003272519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989079,0.0005727336,0.0001452577,0.0002736236,0.00005555162,0.00004498285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001009442,0.0002011321,0.9046383,0.0002635808,0.0003389706,0.00001340636,0.002621067,0.008576127,0.002123625,0.0001915131,0.005366819,0.07556451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006517859,0.0001559456,0.8894389,0.00003043082,0.0001403293,0.00001156515,0.0006098491,0.1065933,0.0002721674,0.001428328,0.0004233829,0.0002439383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938344,0.0006513281,0.003101253,0.00009959367,0.0001570435,0.0003500514,0.0002057508,0.00005646957,0.00154406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956926,0.001758685,0.002319099,0.00001234581,0.0001021589,0.00002622174,0.00004400374,0.00001859577,0.00002631559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09801719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01320831910990908,"score_gpt":0.3741594709003193,"score_spread":0.3609511517904102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}