{"id":"W1973671232","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765156","title":"Pipeline risk assessment and risk acceptance criteria in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Pipeline (software); Pipeline transport; Gas pipeline; Environmental planning; Environmental risk assessment; Business; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; Computer security; Petroleum engineering; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005838601,0.0004071204,0.0002886986,0.003889011,0.001120934,0.002418393,0.0005896605,0.0005769215,0.001183675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01892331,0.0002994481,0.0004462261,0.001880104,0.001532594,0.00120789,0.001530448,0.0004798432,0.0000994311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003025829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003620497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04128192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04679909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953908,0.001842529,0.0004788202,0.0002649496,0.001743363,0.0002795483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868953,0.006721843,0.002156742,0.0003692251,0.003557325,0.0002996006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002626148,0.000202561,0.3315126,0.001023735,0.0002161973,0.002555172,0.02041222,0.1055208,0.01089133,0.2618508,0.004337869,0.2612142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007341075,0.0007923687,0.3625207,0.001841173,0.0003324376,0.004906191,0.03397288,0.3400582,0.01047593,0.1704555,0.07422812,0.0003430539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8489819,0.00166646,0.08246842,0.002614565,0.00002701736,0.0003029782,0.0004269097,0.0002015256,0.06331029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906723,0.0002375968,0.008206587,0.00001826733,0.000004019008,0.00003997062,0.00006882173,0.000008673236,0.0007437733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04128192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08208323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01320831910990908,"score_gpt":0.3741594709003193,"score_spread":0.3609511517904102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}