{"id":"W1973718554","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00169-4","title":"The retirement-consumption puzzle: a marital bargaining approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Wife; Demographic economics; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Permanent income hypothesis; Panel data; Marital status; Labour economics; Sample (material); Life-cycle hypothesis; Demography; Econometrics; Population; Macroeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00471339,0.0005149536,0.001623428,0.0012356,0.002111298,0.003406044,0.00303845,0.006156063,0.03203592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01732107,0.0004201629,0.001170589,0.001726056,0.002635493,0.006829043,0.002081517,0.004732421,0.001408276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001467476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001575571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003573826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004693832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992654,0.0003458297,0.00002743274,0.0000919708,0.000116881,0.0001525721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942537,0.004069207,0.0006509597,0.0004054404,0.0002907435,0.0003300103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001953885,0.0001582878,0.003997758,0.00007568962,0.00006513326,0.0002913022,0.0007447027,0.008307089,0.0002156723,0.9547193,0.01226305,0.01896657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001244619,0.0000230292,0.002826784,0.00005794003,0.00003736397,0.0000712856,0.0008557459,0.01753707,0.00005153219,0.9721971,0.006196009,0.00002169939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4644876,0.02127585,0.09946748,0.2081718,0.001350975,0.0001444668,0.001814072,0.0002177256,0.20307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589519,0.004153266,0.002977018,0.004010389,0.001610589,0.00008043838,0.0002554543,0.00004067177,0.02792024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03203592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1071708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0645038979635905,"score_gpt":0.2791512958189237,"score_spread":0.2146473978553332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}