{"id":"W1973746887","doi":"10.1007/s00184-013-0462-8","title":"Shrinkage estimation for the mean of the inverse Gaussian population","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Shrinkage; Statistics; Estimation; Inverse Gaussian distribution; Inverse; Gaussian; Applied mathematics; Population mean; Population; Shrinkage estimator; Mathematical analysis; Mean squared error; Geometry; Minimum-variance unbiased estimator; Estimator; Demography; Distribution (mathematics); Minimax estimator","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006441034,0.0009698702,0.00147732,0.001376612,0.0005360579,0.001541755,0.001864491,0.00177694,0.002259587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03363827,0.0008627356,0.001446612,0.001085048,0.002547527,0.003148286,0.002793557,0.003868494,0.001083561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009830358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001587988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002382278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002104223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982929,0.0007946679,0.00007441654,0.0004016512,0.0003233271,0.0001131562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919052,0.005712493,0.0004709653,0.0007541796,0.0009764371,0.0001806118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002444952,0.00008845071,0.002781198,0.0004503264,0.0002144803,0.0001638663,0.0006128008,0.3558491,0.01197047,0.4521013,0.004588881,0.1709346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001531111,0.00003527335,0.0006315373,0.00004595189,0.00002746657,0.0001147199,0.00004071116,0.8884584,0.001731001,0.1067337,0.002128064,0.00003792382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00383087,0.0001647665,0.9953192,0.000154778,0.00002942949,0.00001042275,0.00002312523,0.00007035805,0.0003970269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.281872,0.002170641,0.7036882,0.0003553308,0.0004842513,0.000383253,0.0006539042,0.0005290233,0.009863387],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006441034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03406382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06752974827852377,"score_gpt":0.3499977326993922,"score_spread":0.2824679844208685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}