{"id":"W1973752528","doi":"10.1177/1473871611433713","title":"Note-taking in co-located collaborative visual analytics: Analysis of an observational study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Visualization","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Visual analytics; Computer science; Analytics; Scope (computer science); Visualization; Process (computing); Data science; Observational study; Interactive visual analysis; Data visualization; Cultural analytics; Human–computer interaction; Data analysis; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Semantic analytics; Data mining; The Internet","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001180451,0.0001714122,0.0003398651,0.001938766,0.0001079429,0.0002399417,0.0004065762,0.00008840315,0.00007202324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003685664,0.0001783415,0.00005584967,0.008805616,0.00003326277,0.009651908,0.00008129679,0.00007286151,0.00002730829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001301744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001578435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007416436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009804996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974931,0.0002572798,0.001087635,0.0001756248,0.0007329188,0.0002533837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977253,0.00009695415,0.0009179231,0.0003508132,0.0007938639,0.0001151659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000332142,0.001792383,0.7333037,0.00003807095,0.000299892,8.129785e-7,0.03598271,0.07690571,0.0001107142,0.146118,0.0001330487,0.005281718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004326008,0.00009360882,0.302078,0.000007327675,0.00008958805,2.765565e-7,0.001481864,0.6949514,0.0003581744,0.00002871141,0.0003317891,0.0001466692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2478636,0.000006503104,0.7510663,0.00001849995,0.0001059628,0.000326333,0.00004109723,0.00009216459,0.0004795321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950939,0.000005262022,0.001996884,0.0003424314,0.00002678814,0.00001692967,0.002502139,0.000006844389,0.000008814195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7490694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7272555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08260358718690645,"score_gpt":0.4163798796457103,"score_spread":0.3337762924588039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}