{"id":"W1973776715","doi":"10.5558/tfc2013-040","title":"Canadian national taper models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Statistics; Forest inventory; Estimation; Geography; Autocorrelation; Tree (set theory); Variance components; Forestry; Mathematics; Econometrics; Environmental science; Forest management; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001193728,0.00005964142,0.00003728694,0.00001207031,0.0002135716,0.00002163621,0.0002666171,0.00003658657,0.01785393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007116705,0.00004134958,0.00002238907,0.00007401545,0.0001343737,0.0002439092,0.0001076247,0.00007629603,0.009222972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004592614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004954825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1561113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.203812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993898,0.00001514724,0.00006939422,0.0001168366,0.0001406185,0.000268157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997165,0.0000148438,0.00001699099,0.0001564793,0.0000052868,0.00008994084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003167384,0.00004549344,0.01312765,0.000003275694,0.00002370696,0.000004140995,0.0002638813,0.1517956,0.0001035987,0.1838138,0.6491925,0.001623244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002729147,0.00003920689,0.3114848,0.000002442571,0.000007121307,0.000008125733,0.00006270462,0.1062641,0.00006938121,0.5181273,0.06349503,0.0001668417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6579657,0.00003343049,0.0001885116,0.008055204,0.0001211914,0.0003483903,0.000003877195,0.00003502489,0.3332487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907932,0.00000347305,0.0001017142,0.002073784,0.00003212205,0.00006409951,0.000004076131,0.000005992706,0.006921492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5856974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009017397683828143,"score_gpt":0.1998019293098303,"score_spread":0.1907845316260021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}