{"id":"W1973913679","doi":"10.5964/ejop.v10i1.697","title":"Dyadic Empathy, Dyadic Coping, and Relationship Satisfaction: A Dyadic Model","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe’s Journal of Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Empathy; Coping (psychology); Partner effects; Social psychology; Dyad; Perspective (graphical); Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001164901,0.0002613993,0.0004191662,0.0004940516,0.0002609754,0.0000444959,0.0002935045,0.0003098342,0.0004174914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002416627,0.0002330052,0.0001343856,0.0003663488,0.0002924532,0.0002406678,0.00004530094,0.001100525,0.0003587748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004592753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005650392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008311827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001528673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973099,0.0007408447,0.0009247157,0.0003670065,0.0002645654,0.0003930136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979526,0.0003664681,0.0007742947,0.0004409364,0.0002069951,0.000258726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003236789,0.0002036565,0.8541675,0.00002343921,0.0002270093,0.0001111146,0.003856122,0.0009019266,0.0001746336,0.09052434,0.03985586,0.009630675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002991047,0.0008051072,0.9592517,0.0000595305,0.0001847115,0.00239522,0.0001565813,0.002768408,0.000001142332,0.01518581,0.01586901,0.0003317386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7339566,0.003215143,0.1944222,0.005632704,0.004270512,0.0002501176,0.00000671816,0.0000809805,0.05816503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913024,0.0002020207,0.002649519,0.001569097,0.0005726838,0.000005251468,0.000006088437,0.00005756929,0.00363538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2573458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9501675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04512188928517904,"score_gpt":0.4077890329870375,"score_spread":0.3626671437018585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}