{"id":"W1974026252","doi":"10.1080/15715124.2006.9635288","title":"Two analytical approaches for quantifying physical habitat as a limit to aquatic ecosystems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of River Basin Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Habitat; Ecosystem; Streamflow; Population; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecology; Watershed; Carrying capacity; Quantile regression; Quantile; Geography; Biology; Statistics; Mathematics; Drainage basin; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003070889,0.0009300445,0.0006457911,0.004454294,0.0004796402,0.002086899,0.001742715,0.0006841499,0.002187511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01323083,0.0005715254,0.001007031,0.002632178,0.001925522,0.002108227,0.002156542,0.0007796706,0.0002048217],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00229226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001781005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01241668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009146594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998321,0.0007663116,0.00006825313,0.0002259594,0.0004335305,0.0001848027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937186,0.003493427,0.001372036,0.0004569207,0.0007902402,0.0001687852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006534303,0.0002219737,0.05184305,0.0003300795,0.0002641582,0.0002810743,0.0006744571,0.6441828,0.004521081,0.2111766,0.001505232,0.08493409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009038222,0.000143807,0.02049399,0.0001186381,0.00006880951,0.0002130314,0.0006463116,0.8904258,0.001291036,0.08147504,0.005039054,0.00007540279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09718197,0.0009769686,0.8909814,0.0006035443,0.00002625257,0.0001433217,0.0004132587,0.0002271408,0.009446164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8297155,0.000975155,0.1660923,0.0001487618,0.00005315979,0.0003515983,0.0002257141,0.00007178821,0.002365942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01241668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02468884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03716552609715462,"score_gpt":0.2897695438659192,"score_spread":0.2526040177687646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}