{"id":"W1974068770","doi":"10.1006/rtph.2001.1493","title":"IPCS Conceptual Framework for Evaluating a Mode of Action for Chemical Carcinogenesis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":348,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Terminology; Standardization; Computer science; Flexibility (engineering); Conceptual framework; Action (physics); Hazard; Management science; Medicine; Engineering; Chemistry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01293448,0.002102422,0.001676418,0.006634356,0.002276431,0.008204155,0.005878248,0.003798124,0.01338859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009992176,0.0008310422,0.003000526,0.003404904,0.006773548,0.005887052,0.003820091,0.00469604,0.003953067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005467071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01059995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008826439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004272175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924078,0.002524058,0.0005223821,0.0007140876,0.003402434,0.0004292128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934257,0.001990542,0.0004237304,0.0009050217,0.002977054,0.0002778886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008592836,0.00002141711,0.0001046907,0.00008059119,0.0000200056,0.00004259021,0.00008243063,0.005008657,0.0003427867,0.9852625,0.002234231,0.006791438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002266866,0.000112067,0.0002378097,0.0001940626,0.000097509,0.0001566542,0.0001902761,0.02304561,0.002300743,0.8941772,0.07943207,0.00003337929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001895844,0.0008679417,0.8669968,0.004379717,0.0003203925,0.0005105558,0.0008449309,0.0006057003,0.1235782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1644176,0.002086785,0.7893586,0.002173613,0.0007048416,0.003080145,0.00112426,0.0003100252,0.03674408],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01338859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06840485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0565971139785305,"score_gpt":0.4013231025654033,"score_spread":0.3447259885868728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}