{"id":"W1974091763","doi":"10.1088/0960-1317/23/6/065001","title":"A recoil resilient lumen support, design, fabrication and mechanical evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Recoil; Materials science; Stent; Finite element method; Rigidity (electromagnetism); Compression (physics); Elastic recoil; Structural engineering; Fabrication; Biomedical engineering; Lumen (anatomy); Sawtooth wave; Composite material; Computer science; Engineering; Surgery; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003865359,0.000358994,0.0002240644,0.0006723265,0.0001997624,0.0004164822,0.0004584329,0.0005807512,0.0006432866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003131653,0.0002298459,0.0002751366,0.0002365092,0.0002072786,0.0003919523,0.0002159739,0.0002879353,0.0004126179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001683314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001964335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000132267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001790445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997278,0.00001883739,0.00001763066,0.00004554158,0.0001632348,0.0000269533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996852,0.0000289791,0.0001125905,0.00004195471,0.00008187485,0.00004944884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007669655,0.0001159479,0.0009010006,0.000215226,0.00001199645,0.0002735578,0.0001059589,0.0009994073,0.9788893,0.0004874613,0.0002707154,0.01765265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003791953,0.003796163,0.01466583,0.00004108937,0.0000646875,0.001697038,0.00009866704,0.006770395,0.942102,0.000166122,0.03049784,0.00006227506],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9558847,0.004541004,0.03395087,0.0001639022,0.0001234953,0.0002342694,0.0003814029,0.0004051123,0.00431524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274664,0.001641377,0.06522831,0.0000571603,0.00004655133,0.0001472346,0.0004168568,0.0000488092,0.00494735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0006723265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002152026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01959007117834592,"score_gpt":0.2573382509735475,"score_spread":0.2377481797952015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}