{"id":"W1974092530","doi":"10.5558/tfc791075-6","title":"Operational mapping of the land cover of the forested area of Canada with Landsat data: EOSD land cover program","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Space Agency; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Land cover; Cover (algebra); Environmental resource management; Geography; Land use; Land information system; General partnership; Remote sensing; Agency (philosophy); Agriculture; Land management; Business; Environmental science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009854593,0.0006832539,0.0003507309,0.004062664,0.00264109,0.001908756,0.001278458,0.0002357752,0.00421868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002022219,0.0003197555,0.000407409,0.006337345,0.0005282309,0.000575192,0.001163809,0.000639206,0.001297963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02348984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09147592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987456,0.00004827803,0.00003466317,0.0001064123,0.0008191913,0.000245806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995526,0.00006490705,0.0001254998,0.0001176227,0.003817221,0.0003488396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003013724,0.0004168715,0.1565057,0.0009120264,0.000203028,0.0003671427,0.002085797,0.008243131,0.01101191,0.009986687,0.4581619,0.3518046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001002515,0.00006088056,0.5516692,0.0002874271,0.00005897208,0.0001158351,0.002751622,0.01884333,0.004803089,0.001109108,0.420085,0.00011537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2062727,0.002863039,0.04458684,0.003516702,0.0003292732,0.003646097,0.5315838,0.004641871,0.2025597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3920878,0.003144187,0.1370998,0.0009519486,0.00005008054,0.001704087,0.3785447,0.0007189555,0.08569841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02348984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1704316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00991676958387512,"score_gpt":0.1922328064063261,"score_spread":0.182316036822451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}