{"id":"W1974316556","doi":"10.1145/1082983.1083124","title":"A qualitative empirical evaluation of design decisions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Management science; Decision analysis; Function (biology); Process (computing); Decision engineering; Business decision mapping; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Decision support system; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04114893,0.0006573717,0.000454359,0.00472545,0.002877754,0.004400928,0.001288329,0.00109046,0.007494912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1376187,0.0004100869,0.0003483828,0.004151983,0.006219632,0.00510226,0.002646525,0.001340477,0.000810065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005478596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004292162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001703793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002779903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9480069,0.04103367,0.001434758,0.00123145,0.007463274,0.0008299303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8031986,0.1587158,0.006173561,0.006120618,0.02466191,0.001129471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008100075,0.001128667,0.02789529,0.004557472,0.00007904867,0.0009230325,0.324598,0.008107643,0.01271671,0.3566849,0.01049809,0.2520011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002477726,0.001883041,0.01991257,0.004573694,0.00008992299,0.0008088115,0.6049652,0.02317074,0.02467464,0.1512577,0.1681838,0.0002320577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5032864,0.001086458,0.3083836,0.006233918,0.0002865123,0.006600692,0.003238034,0.0002958205,0.1705886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9080274,0.000659984,0.08009916,0.0004814287,0.00002726909,0.00353062,0.0005073389,0.00005669244,0.006610197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04114893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2176189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1830927904344468,"score_gpt":0.4182378890722724,"score_spread":0.2351450986378256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}