{"id":"W1974383551","doi":"10.1109/tmag.2010.2085049","title":"Three-Dimensional Nonaxisymmetric Pole Piece Shape Optimization for Biplanar Permanent-Magnet MRI Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","topic":"Superconducting Materials and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Magnet; Homogeneity (statistics); Pole piece; Physics; Magnetic field; Finite element method; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Acoustics; Optics; Computational physics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001016558,0.0001961331,0.000167512,0.0002010237,0.0002012008,0.00008944041,0.0001482672,0.000158894,0.001231724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004594911,0.0002052909,0.00007099604,0.0002877293,0.00004123563,0.00009855044,9.732597e-7,0.0002147574,0.0001059691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002532042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002034608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006697843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007521758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990638,0.000008920577,0.0002766945,0.0002291582,0.0001656141,0.0002558138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999361,0.0001203073,0.00002856668,0.0002951521,0.00009468077,0.0001002899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001111184,0.0001016354,0.000003686309,0.00007467507,0.00002465683,7.233454e-7,0.00003583342,0.9069694,0.08332698,0.0001453845,0.002040884,0.007264986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004579932,0.0001323069,0.0000377445,0.00001498333,0.00007043348,0.00002566866,0.00003286589,0.9752917,0.01673306,0.00004149404,0.006866103,0.0002956881],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2904053,0.0001421671,0.7032833,0.0002126988,0.003853769,0.0007753937,0.0004587259,0.0004809378,0.000387794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703447,0.00005267268,0.02866323,0.0000417897,0.0002460564,0.0002791822,0.00005921538,0.00007643078,0.0002367264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6799394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01419960119890526,"score_gpt":0.2168324369050662,"score_spread":0.202632835706161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}