{"id":"W1974383551","doi":"10.1109/tmag.2010.2085049","title":"Three-Dimensional Nonaxisymmetric Pole Piece Shape Optimization for Biplanar Permanent-Magnet MRI Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","topic":"Superconducting Materials and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Magnet; Homogeneity (statistics); Pole piece; Physics; Magnetic field; Finite element method; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Acoustics; Optics; Computational physics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003197415,0.0004264094,0.000343996,0.0002814069,0.0001537911,0.000321806,0.0003164445,0.0003726251,0.0008048165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008126903,0.0002980133,0.0002664497,0.0002014827,0.0002334488,0.0002731677,0.0002013919,0.0002149211,0.0002563401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000265501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002779578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002225432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004421044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998616,0.00003765028,0.000005262629,0.00001527747,0.00006748838,0.0000127886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996544,0.0001603077,0.00007695054,0.00003737459,0.00005514416,0.00001573836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001495002,0.00004887313,0.0004988394,0.0001316851,0.00002684911,0.00009126142,0.00007452192,0.8512913,0.1049845,0.002304444,0.0004325316,0.03996569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001948675,0.0001888542,0.0006182514,0.000003513958,0.00001022465,0.00007256354,0.0000205311,0.9781979,0.01860309,0.001146873,0.001104933,0.00001385803],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3086324,0.000316743,0.6862683,0.000122039,0.00003153353,0.00005009042,0.00005860549,0.0003736914,0.004146597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8311887,0.0001002765,0.1669142,0.00002004326,0.00001023873,0.00006826849,0.00007051205,0.0001002797,0.001527565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008048165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002692342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01419960119890526,"score_gpt":0.2168324369050662,"score_spread":0.202632835706161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}