{"id":"W1974384462","doi":"10.4236/jmf.2012.22017","title":"Option Pricing Applications of Quadratic Volatility Models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Finance","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Stylized fact; Econometrics; Stochastic volatility; Autoregressive model; Kurtosis; Conditional variance; Volatility (finance); Valuation of options; Economics; Implied volatility; Black–Scholes model; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001614462,0.0001121448,0.0005634679,0.0001381454,0.00005807675,0.00001410468,0.0002033809,0.00009317032,0.00004020835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003179965,0.0001086676,0.0001880449,0.0002381887,0.00005642693,0.000660038,0.00003264745,0.0002101463,0.00004542919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006697032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002762899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007426045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.797987e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980863,0.00001677389,0.001458645,0.0001154394,0.00009215927,0.0002307284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982966,0.0001481601,0.001094899,0.0002569915,0.0001314196,0.00007197613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001942115,0.0003812404,0.005164512,0.0002008888,0.00001686738,2.531976e-7,0.001019004,0.0011339,0.00005546064,0.9895979,0.00003820924,0.002372373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002133881,0.00005457147,0.003999637,0.0001026637,0.000013768,0.0000111397,0.00004861263,0.1805092,0.0001744901,0.8138936,0.0008654952,0.0001135146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.338359,0.002056161,0.6577008,0.00007342638,0.00007483829,0.0001220649,0.000009664137,0.00000485904,0.001599147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499865,0.0001749222,0.04958497,0.00001781845,0.0001334417,0.000008816951,6.09106e-7,0.00001180267,0.00008115215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6116275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4431335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05635108650633305,"score_gpt":0.2595169536475724,"score_spread":0.2031658671412393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}