{"id":"W1974384698","doi":"10.1145/1358628.1358654","title":"A comparative evaluation of heuristic-based usability inspection methods","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Usability; Heuristic evaluation; Heuristics; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Heuristic; Set (abstract data type); Usability inspection; Usability goals; Outcome (game theory); Cognitive walkthrough; Reliability engineering; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00273614,0.00009015431,0.0002044481,0.00006994858,0.0001031914,0.00001591866,0.0003374045,0.00004353371,0.0001133864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003416713,0.00007828981,0.00006629286,0.0003927039,0.0001657359,0.0002866403,0.00004653727,0.00008346416,0.00002143357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001120281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002340832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000126824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002957367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977,0.001135735,0.000294051,0.000306051,0.0004502358,0.0001138754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982367,0.0004255019,0.00009567437,0.0005336672,0.0006635633,0.00004495574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000857126,0.01366203,0.1081921,0.000463603,0.0005533603,0.00001089958,0.08346003,0.2169335,0.182919,0.1762817,0.01926459,0.1974021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003127365,0.0001440014,0.03364751,0.0000043309,0.00001090997,0.000003266451,0.00003750759,0.7654609,0.1952822,0.004901564,0.0001141049,0.00008098008],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2992689,0.00002113684,0.6969525,0.0001250806,0.0001243545,0.0002066159,8.957561e-7,0.0001025161,0.003198005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7190012,4.02591e-7,0.2809151,0.0000406911,0.000007261091,0.00001614403,7.869498e-7,0.000001431432,0.00001701165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5485274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3192566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.280983639764195,"score_gpt":0.4390775272608653,"score_spread":0.1580938874966702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}