{"id":"W1974451933","doi":"10.1139/x09-177","title":"Reconstructing and modelling 71 years of forest growth in a Canadian boreal landscape: a test of the CBM-CFS3 carbon accounting model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Taiga; Carbon accounting; Environmental science; Forest inventory; Biomass (ecology); Forestry; Climate change; Physical geography; Carbon fibers; Boreal; Atmospheric sciences; Forest management; Carbon sequestration; Geography; Ecology; Agroforestry; Mathematics; Carbon dioxide; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001794556,0.0001030815,0.0001958047,0.0006853237,0.0001464975,0.00005798889,0.0005925357,0.0001039704,0.00006752444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006236641,0.00008903989,0.00005823487,0.0007116367,0.0006019722,0.0002136312,0.00008804369,0.0007861085,0.000002869337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001984748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00113599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9053339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982727,0.00005341156,0.000399759,0.0001533322,0.0004175242,0.0007032754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987807,0.0001662929,0.0001808124,0.0002120701,0.00008663318,0.000573513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000596931,0.000006066932,0.9837854,0.00002174542,0.000006092176,0.00002425008,0.0007049644,0.0134704,0.00009441558,0.0009098985,0.0002616757,0.0007091443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003708544,0.00005631335,0.7693569,0.0001384584,0.000009616749,0.00005061308,0.0001776779,0.2260484,0.00006098909,0.003296775,0.0003145816,0.0001188143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787229,0.00003887301,0.000002611706,0.0003683884,0.00007258383,0.0001621579,0.00001499221,0.000001107502,0.02061634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993449,0.00001978025,0.0003929354,0.00001835518,0.00006645667,0.00000223066,0.000001037642,0.00001696478,0.0001373436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2144285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3630941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02352049224067925,"score_gpt":0.2564922971185094,"score_spread":0.2329718048778301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}