{"id":"W1974493008","doi":"10.1007/s10972-006-9024-5","title":"Critiquing Science Lessons for their Authenticity as a Means of Evaluating Teacher-Candidate Understanding of the Nature of Science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Nature of Science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0291183,0.0001222298,0.0002554886,0.0009510973,0.002493223,0.0001910618,0.002405187,0.00008152721,0.0000693913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00953979,0.00008705701,0.0001429692,0.005338368,0.019051,0.001989942,0.0001047561,0.0003928382,3.927416e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001071729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02672573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001211829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002420965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954729,0.0002408557,0.0007548775,0.0003362366,0.002678422,0.0005166744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945107,0.0003505076,0.001669041,0.0003491811,0.002933406,0.0001872011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002993103,0.0009172051,0.03278954,0.0000477196,0.000006424534,5.1806e-8,0.1891214,0.0002192482,0.5165559,0.251516,0.000283304,0.008513297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003778193,0.0002572393,0.1267904,0.0005290934,0.00007349253,0.00001601748,0.6517107,0.001720856,0.1361989,0.08171826,0.0003620929,0.0002450579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822052,0.000148565,0.00116912,0.006561938,0.002455776,0.000317272,0.000003108377,0.000006159241,0.007132883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968112,0.00001160802,0.002452923,0.00006082877,0.0002744128,0.000004663271,1.994195e-7,0.000005767466,0.0003784152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4625893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1370353648547207,"score_gpt":0.4863569798184357,"score_spread":0.349321614963715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}