{"id":"W1974548048","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2013.833408","title":"Science requisites for cumulative effects assessment for wetlands","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Cumulative effects; Environmental resource management; Baseline (sea); Natural (archaeology); Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Environmental planning; Function (biology); Habitat; Conceptual framework; Landscape ecology; Geography; Ecology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000767643,0.0002558943,0.0002269872,0.0001379027,0.0004422564,0.0002842729,0.0002385867,0.00005337554,0.0003424591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007675027,0.000198378,0.0001010401,0.0003417202,0.0003461977,0.0009872664,0.000261211,0.00009309895,0.00002034672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003330535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001017356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003803665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002551351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982467,0.0000452956,0.0002486259,0.0005085528,0.0004237534,0.0005270333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988496,0.0005910969,0.0001395231,0.0002375551,0.00002220585,0.0001600113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016965,0.0008406133,0.6518314,0.0002941382,0.0002236862,0.000002331373,0.001222407,0.0003392968,0.1465564,0.01996104,0.09876323,0.07979572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002168567,0.001831821,0.9245764,0.00002292463,0.00006054001,0.000002789901,0.000317393,0.03764682,0.001097612,0.001777027,0.03004581,0.0004523113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9353772,0.00001862218,0.03737282,0.001911927,0.0003353157,0.005894118,0.00003667214,0.00009736123,0.01895599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947032,0.00001398411,0.05007171,0.0008013952,0.00006045937,0.001278501,0.00006844042,0.00002484026,0.000648702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2727449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.808962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02281287205335803,"score_gpt":0.4080117758798031,"score_spread":0.3851989038264451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}