{"id":"W1974558789","doi":"10.1080/02508060.2011.595056","title":"Assessing the empirical challenges of evaluating the benefits and risks of irrigating with wastewater","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water International","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Reuse","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wastewater; Wastewater reuse; Agriculture; Irrigation; Cost–benefit analysis; Psychological intervention; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Business; Environmental planning; Water resource management; Economics; Environmental engineering; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003378065,0.00007830263,0.00007438346,0.00001472492,0.00007731493,0.00002107953,0.0002208018,0.00002258098,0.0003143282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007865473,0.0000274586,0.00002412821,0.00002128688,0.0002344416,0.0001767803,0.0002072635,0.00005884971,0.000009664586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001453999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002792177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001730814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003612295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992442,0.00005741687,0.0001620282,0.0001331866,0.0002951115,0.0001081104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997088,0.00004547065,0.00007835901,0.0001335626,0.00001650246,0.00001733818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001009321,0.0002244905,0.8251039,0.00002087637,0.0002577562,0.000004802267,0.07132646,0.001045763,0.07517092,0.0004910172,0.00003510459,0.02621799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005989823,0.0003092205,0.5365055,0.0001008239,0.00006502165,0.00003418045,0.003024804,0.001484763,0.4565215,0.001150669,0.00007559335,0.0001290283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932679,0.00004282861,0.000005084987,0.001296235,0.00005821419,0.00008481277,0.000001721951,0.000005129477,0.005238063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854,0.00001082119,0.001281342,0.00002586699,0.00002401457,0.000008849543,0.000002105018,0.000006571337,0.00010037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3813505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3441673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.344117903993895,"score_gpt":0.3786052470610324,"score_spread":0.03448734306713735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}