{"id":"W1974611568","doi":"10.1017/s0952675704000053","title":"Theoretical implications of segment neutrality in nasal harmony","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phonology","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Harmony (color); Consonant; Grammar; Phonotactics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Mathematical economics; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Law; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004611837,0.0001050904,0.0002442835,0.0001554539,0.00003296567,0.000003779673,0.0002586887,0.0002146245,0.006643944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009295572,0.0001018868,0.00005396512,0.0002636517,0.0006621743,0.00001513541,0.00005305654,0.0003444516,0.0002644571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003466248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006864446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000205884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009537206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998373,0.0004628967,0.0003281067,0.0003161745,0.00006037072,0.0004594484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990462,0.0002602923,0.00005754459,0.0005098781,0.00004930284,0.00007675262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007678919,0.0003617317,0.05208787,0.000005178882,0.00004052475,0.000008303868,0.001966949,0.000002536554,0.01425654,0.9286989,0.001117408,0.001377266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001040526,0.0002032099,0.7406109,0.000002826373,0.000008381176,0.00005386465,0.0002031604,0.000007667561,0.01016862,0.2454778,0.002103664,0.0001193933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447788,0.0003402286,0.0002090968,0.002624082,0.0003555116,0.0002006528,0.00001959994,0.00001968873,0.05145231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991704,0.00003634742,0.0001903457,0.0002897439,0.00001690251,0.00009907834,0.000006884693,0.00001187301,0.000178478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6885231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04754347815051781,"score_gpt":0.3775028825843022,"score_spread":0.3299594044337844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}