{"id":"W1974630024","doi":"10.1002/qre.943","title":"Pre‐study analytical method validation: comparison of four alternative approaches based on quality‐level estimation and tolerance intervals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality and Reliability Engineering International","topic":"Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Tolerance interval; Estimator; Variance (accounting); Statistics; Confidence interval; Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Delta method; Nominal level; Mathematics; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001400609,0.0001421414,0.000366379,0.00003360697,0.00008901526,0.00002926712,0.0001491178,0.00006846179,0.00004004097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008097463,0.00007242497,0.00009250348,0.0001399922,0.00006376843,0.0001121962,0.00005323134,0.0001466179,7.933733e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003405644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007867051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004341367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002658245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982303,0.0002754703,0.0006172931,0.0003455961,0.0004188854,0.0001124083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983072,0.001227856,0.0001782063,0.00008832187,0.0001281491,0.00007021565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002356024,0.001100792,0.5428481,0.00008505322,0.0001214031,0.000001995961,0.001034124,0.4310793,0.00106511,0.003760378,0.0000154495,0.01865272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001397418,0.0001120613,0.5266176,0.00001752068,0.00001176994,0.000001248379,0.00007466818,0.4724382,0.0003533851,0.0001324038,0.0000233224,0.00007813027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600214,0.00001677045,0.03853127,0.001006178,0.00006120009,0.0001661421,0.00005614065,0.00002470902,0.0001162077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994252,0.000007479676,0.005547951,0.00003538086,0.00006481587,0.00001438643,0.00004788276,0.000001150401,0.00002892411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04135887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2953404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1914602940113335,"score_gpt":0.3700095797474344,"score_spread":0.1785492857361009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}