{"id":"W1974637702","doi":"10.1890/13-2250.1","title":"Species‐level and community‐level responses to disturbance: a cross‐community analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Utah State University","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Species evenness; Species richness; Relative abundance distribution; Niche; Community; Ecosystem; Measurement of biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Community structure; Biology; Global biodiversity; Geography; Relative species abundance; Biodiversity conservation","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004472696,0.0004876244,0.0008471544,0.002939378,0.0006728153,0.001087825,0.0007012853,0.0007829231,0.002724099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005247504,0.0002281433,0.001506729,0.001863658,0.0007395617,0.001405471,0.001831352,0.0007955453,0.0003164119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005913588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002978889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004270413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004066131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983633,0.0005506719,0.0001184568,0.0004108028,0.0003490295,0.0002077662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955017,0.001834252,0.0006924465,0.0007070876,0.0008064819,0.000458048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001116073,0.0008682879,0.9070892,0.0002591129,0.004524103,0.0002691795,0.001250461,0.006631559,0.04024615,0.0009205515,0.0004736488,0.0363517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001149169,0.0005657236,0.9771722,0.00001117315,0.0003267199,0.0001662758,0.0004027,0.01932782,0.0009648311,0.0005290626,0.000493341,0.0000286426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951615,0.0001477828,0.003803054,0.00001919365,0.00000830746,0.0000620499,0.0002889831,0.00002862431,0.0004806355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996806,0.00004855362,0.002160004,0.00001977956,0.000007339132,0.00007521192,0.0005836879,0.00001277363,0.0002867669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004472696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02365422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08486007503587958,"score_gpt":0.3095992703573829,"score_spread":0.2247391953215034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}