{"id":"W1974734699","doi":"10.1065/lca2006.03.002","title":"Establishing a Framework for Life Cycle Toxicity Assessment. Findings of the Lausanne Review Workshop (4 pp)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Life cycle inventory; Engineering; Environmental science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0308859,0.001449297,0.001307281,0.007833865,0.001600309,0.006688833,0.003215773,0.003882654,0.002172593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01387593,0.0007940911,0.001233629,0.003491086,0.007161931,0.007222198,0.003887373,0.005480922,0.001236974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01239628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02214044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02165317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03015308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889908,0.005635951,0.001019793,0.0005583235,0.003251231,0.0005438849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881731,0.005495881,0.001147974,0.0004563589,0.00420937,0.0005174659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005646636,0.0001242961,0.001025051,0.01208192,0.0001445043,0.0004302682,0.004225991,0.003035239,0.003110632,0.2495914,0.2683518,0.4578224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002443518,0.0001480756,0.00224111,0.01367797,0.0001037464,0.0002849562,0.003075721,0.0008153817,0.001332835,0.09119686,0.8870495,0.00004949893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002213605,0.8080046,0.04828843,0.1122407,0.0053502,0.0004711437,0.0004134886,0.0002864974,0.02273139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09601238,0.6246985,0.2047474,0.04736908,0.004303644,0.003206684,0.001286807,0.0002382088,0.01813732],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0308859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1633422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01465898817532762,"score_gpt":0.3255316692805129,"score_spread":0.3108726811051852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}