{"id":"W1974789528","doi":"10.3390/rs4040830","title":"LiDAR Sampling Density for Forest Resource Inventories in Ontario, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; 3v Geomatics (Canada); Canadian Forest Service; Queen's University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Lidar; Forest inventory; Basal area; Environmental science; Sampling (signal processing); Range (aeronautics); Forest management; Stratified sampling; Forestry; Remote sensing; Geography; Statistics; Agroforestry; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009782824,0.0003274591,0.000335029,0.002358758,0.001808886,0.00092313,0.001146471,0.0001660898,0.003904378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002846524,0.0003271567,0.0003596523,0.005703357,0.0002842579,0.0004820704,0.0005500946,0.0003103311,0.0008549828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02329491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03352441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991959,0.00005225318,0.00004898159,0.0001008672,0.0004989063,0.0001031903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975903,0.0001681413,0.0002156548,0.00009861033,0.001793762,0.0001335071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001599282,0.00009617045,0.7221412,0.0005029009,0.0001340525,0.0002623039,0.001859141,0.01566126,0.003669705,0.003068052,0.04486597,0.2075794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003414755,0.00002549379,0.926142,0.0001752771,0.0000457198,0.00008184201,0.001098451,0.02131094,0.000689815,0.0005003239,0.04984863,0.00004749617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7154419,0.003747349,0.04049448,0.0009767079,0.00007540057,0.001826011,0.1778386,0.001428202,0.05817141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8453531,0.002465738,0.06125042,0.000243661,0.00002696926,0.0009572369,0.05979219,0.0001685811,0.02974207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02329491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1690172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02402617207777752,"score_gpt":0.2340270086481462,"score_spread":0.2100008365703687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}