{"id":"W1974789528","doi":"10.3390/rs4040830","title":"LiDAR Sampling Density for Forest Resource Inventories in Ontario, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; 3v Geomatics (Canada); Canadian Forest Service; Queen's University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Lidar; Forest inventory; Basal area; Environmental science; Sampling (signal processing); Range (aeronautics); Forest management; Stratified sampling; Forestry; Remote sensing; Geography; Statistics; Agroforestry; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003208235,0.0001381164,0.0001595419,0.00002857145,0.00023825,0.00002797568,0.00007979538,0.00006673963,0.00001844603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009238801,0.0001452819,0.00004400256,0.000167084,0.00006484214,0.00009331956,0.00007461403,0.0001832069,0.00001816034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00130725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001038174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9785914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987994,0.00003407362,0.0002148354,0.0002408472,0.0002144622,0.0004963106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993498,0.0001241579,0.00007318259,0.0002881796,0.00001076387,0.0001538691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002044418,0.0001490769,0.4460019,0.00008179876,0.00007221793,0.00003568547,0.01724951,0.02345107,0.05251777,0.0004928431,0.02241456,0.4373291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004665081,0.00002120105,0.3349437,0.0000935862,0.00003340853,0.00009140569,0.0007142075,0.03505018,0.003770223,0.001499422,0.6227235,0.0005926995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772558,0.00001906666,0.01377972,0.0002787687,0.0001823036,0.0002373158,0.000001217789,0.00003091998,0.008214875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558992,7.680783e-7,0.04296334,0.0003031056,0.0001114625,2.117922e-8,0.00001404771,0.0000207017,0.0006873386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.600309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5924423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02402617207777752,"score_gpt":0.2340270086481462,"score_spread":0.2100008365703687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}