{"id":"W1974813886","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.016","title":"The strategic peril of information sharing in a vertical-Nash supply chain: A note","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Economics","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supply chain; Comparative statics; Information sharing; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Economics; Industrial organization; Pareto optimal; Business; Computer science; Operations management; Multi-objective optimization; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004790536,0.0004497997,0.0007241271,0.0006419237,0.002889617,0.007046195,0.001973534,0.004909441,0.01777353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02212861,0.0005236639,0.0009923007,0.00104905,0.005896902,0.0176431,0.003742248,0.00368259,0.001072719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003034325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004909683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005116037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005018313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996847,0.001410004,0.0001541454,0.0004604689,0.0007078183,0.0004206386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813023,0.01303321,0.001079483,0.001827382,0.001903058,0.000854507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000728029,0.00003559012,0.0006704592,0.00005901862,0.00001740228,0.0001731563,0.0002651578,0.01133307,0.0003776131,0.9788064,0.001749317,0.006439948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001759369,0.00002758453,0.0001576779,0.00002726537,0.0000110126,0.00008135692,0.0003692013,0.03044776,0.0003180174,0.9660749,0.002449933,0.00001768762],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2014573,0.002341436,0.3816766,0.06314579,0.0007107616,0.0002199368,0.0003166427,0.0001753465,0.3499562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755467,0.0005762868,0.01017822,0.0005574372,0.0001741789,0.00004870562,0.00002913443,0.00002444369,0.01286476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01777353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05945843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01756795133402717,"score_gpt":0.2232347390246105,"score_spread":0.2056667876905833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}