{"id":"W1974923626","doi":"10.2514/1.45790","title":"Comparison of Surrogate Models in a Multidisciplinary Optimization Framework for Wing Design","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIAA Journal","topic":"Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wing; Multidisciplinary design optimization; Surrogate model; Multidisciplinary approach; Computational fluid dynamics; Shape optimization; Wing configuration; Computer science; Aerospace engineering; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Structural engineering; Mathematics; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00293531,0.0006069538,0.0008555708,0.0005847455,0.0002563559,0.0009466769,0.0007187096,0.001195834,0.001134381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00453636,0.0003057518,0.0007162385,0.0007025704,0.0004386694,0.001125355,0.001010274,0.001020131,0.0002924778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004800688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000678257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000858631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001195258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998572,0.0009848352,0.00004388935,0.00005220178,0.0003098683,0.00003721883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982482,0.001149836,0.0001090998,0.0002210247,0.0002267075,0.00004518075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007824718,0.00004571619,0.0002998943,0.00004336395,0.00002571361,0.00001808308,0.00002161973,0.9734455,0.0007954289,0.01194767,0.0001023936,0.01317642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005764387,0.00005293456,0.00008980948,0.00000754756,0.000003677668,0.000009893869,0.000007102472,0.9969117,0.0003093412,0.002251226,0.0003469692,0.000003937544],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05441128,0.0005558356,0.9400468,0.0002812841,0.0000372726,0.00005326577,0.00006708383,0.0001387292,0.004408421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7364894,0.0006830305,0.2607447,0.00007166572,0.0000222453,0.0002113337,0.0001738914,0.0000947283,0.001509031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00293531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01552355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06017781714268427,"score_gpt":0.3664730247398953,"score_spread":0.3062952075972111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}