{"id":"W1975028403","doi":"10.1103/physreva.79.032335","title":"Upper bounds for the secure key rate of the decoy-state quantum key distribution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Xunta de Galicia; University of Toronto","keywords":"Quantum key distribution; Key (lock); Computer science; Protocol (science); Coherent states; Security analysis; State (computer science); Theoretical computer science; Quantum; Algorithm; Computer security; Quantum mechanics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003816505,0.0001115326,0.0002012927,0.00001108017,0.0001698179,0.00007058417,0.0007386022,0.00001345694,0.000003697229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001178264,0.00005418968,0.0003608937,0.000538668,0.00006350729,0.0002833362,0.00006211964,0.0001067059,0.0000205254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001214866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004153364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002714959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.432869e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999151,0.00007823422,0.0002628866,0.0001315719,0.0001886723,0.0001876712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989706,0.0001627991,0.0001878955,0.0005047757,0.0001290363,0.00004494171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000424403,0.00005813589,0.00001390529,0.0001471459,0.00001123614,6.127123e-8,0.0003023665,0.00001034224,0.00008510932,0.9561625,0.009366647,0.03383827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003597211,0.0001916138,0.01196304,0.0006840294,0.00006612396,0.000003342154,0.0000144164,0.1213606,0.001238059,0.3463829,0.5174968,0.0002393928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04454545,0.01485489,0.8831199,0.05348059,0.0005355256,0.002083473,0.00008356336,0.0001435531,0.001153098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910197,0.002741765,0.000200648,0.005911177,0.00004915153,0.00004858836,0.000008967968,0.000003474775,0.00001649033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2209791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01126409476115619,"score_gpt":0.2814674101089623,"score_spread":0.2702033153478061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}