{"id":"W1975028403","doi":"10.1103/physreva.79.032335","title":"Upper bounds for the secure key rate of the decoy-state quantum key distribution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Xunta de Galicia; University of Toronto","keywords":"Quantum key distribution; Key (lock); Computer science; Protocol (science); Coherent states; Security analysis; State (computer science); Theoretical computer science; Quantum; Algorithm; Computer security; Quantum mechanics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009905664,0.002823516,0.001887827,0.002828524,0.001258695,0.003978383,0.002679822,0.002298687,0.006562453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04193036,0.001011437,0.002048082,0.00158152,0.005594698,0.006470429,0.004581693,0.006968021,0.002255925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004292897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002729818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001033377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006479986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928101,0.00204757,0.0002904,0.0009633286,0.002592996,0.0012956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9438237,0.04408663,0.002562028,0.004413187,0.00426901,0.0008453387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003915527,0.0001549041,0.0007329739,0.000450824,0.00008378907,0.0002280155,0.0003531809,0.201167,0.01287054,0.7511636,0.002753199,0.02965044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003217656,0.00009673736,0.0004043154,0.0001626388,0.00004024925,0.0001563241,0.00005700949,0.7422504,0.0108997,0.242791,0.003030502,0.00007904076],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03229584,0.002758983,0.9275737,0.001836251,0.0001375608,0.0001569047,0.0004628787,0.0003849084,0.03439303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7507943,0.00680857,0.2247048,0.0006505124,0.0004796308,0.00104181,0.0007322109,0.0008667244,0.01392143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009905664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05238682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01126409476115619,"score_gpt":0.2814674101089623,"score_spread":0.2702033153478061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}