{"id":"W1975057653","doi":"10.1142/s0218194010004621","title":"ASSESSING TEST SUITES FOR BUFFER OVERFLOW VULNERABILITIES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","topic":"Software Testing and Debugging Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Buffer overflow; Test suite; Computer science; Secure coding; Software security assurance; Benchmark (surveying); Test case; Mutation; Software; Exploit; Reliability engineering; Vulnerability (computing); Computer security; Engineering; Operating system; Machine learning; Information security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006171823,0.0002027203,0.0002344906,0.0003958315,0.00005646357,0.0004622673,0.00068431,0.00009564032,0.000002688546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01362759,0.0001931709,0.0001043559,0.0001491835,0.00002216251,0.0008407799,0.0001407056,0.0004356634,0.000001034365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005338229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009404313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003470847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.837544e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989421,0.00000681621,0.0003928117,0.0001930284,0.0002323611,0.0002328951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942897,0.004542482,0.000130461,0.0001862942,0.0007202704,0.0001308235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005510281,0.001048295,0.1708881,0.001444795,0.001091318,0.0003140232,0.006246776,0.03296103,0.1494751,0.04022206,0.01291686,0.5833365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001474695,0.0003558747,0.02868694,0.001286927,0.00004871911,0.001822314,0.00002296929,0.920059,0.01776022,0.002603027,0.02478434,0.001094927],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1046457,0.0005243644,0.8898626,0.0001074794,0.003319857,0.00006222065,0.000004821053,0.001460541,0.00001241301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6011841,0.0000102293,0.3981338,0.00001179477,0.0006070625,0.000008048333,0.000001150567,0.00002150206,0.00002229989],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.887098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01213610208872551,"score_gpt":0.2743313331835174,"score_spread":0.2621952310947919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}