{"id":"W1975057653","doi":"10.1142/s0218194010004621","title":"ASSESSING TEST SUITES FOR BUFFER OVERFLOW VULNERABILITIES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","topic":"Software Testing and Debugging Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Buffer overflow; Test suite; Computer science; Secure coding; Software security assurance; Benchmark (surveying); Test case; Mutation; Software; Exploit; Reliability engineering; Vulnerability (computing); Computer security; Engineering; Operating system; Machine learning; Information security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003912335,0.001228429,0.0005573069,0.004355071,0.0002477778,0.0006665558,0.0008729455,0.0006830472,0.000618202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02986167,0.000252663,0.000752594,0.001460108,0.0005428386,0.0007858056,0.000678185,0.0004100093,0.00009593157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005967729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007035385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00130449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001229685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995801,0.001842458,0.0003798532,0.0003327863,0.0014084,0.0002354536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707907,0.02297006,0.002474202,0.001118663,0.002165959,0.0004804085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009308841,0.001090165,0.1229843,0.0006676735,0.0004951348,0.001672638,0.0008398492,0.4843923,0.0918817,0.007161111,0.00151193,0.2863723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001364337,0.00191454,0.02633415,0.00007475734,0.0002566339,0.0009271484,0.0002634693,0.9141574,0.04862406,0.005857559,0.001397035,0.0000568808],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8937856,0.0003586048,0.1029531,0.0001156635,0.00001752876,0.0001689339,0.0002689791,0.001375577,0.0009559485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328277,0.0001603918,0.0657686,0.00003036261,0.00001013612,0.0001522213,0.0007835312,0.00008955682,0.0001775301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004355071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02069062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01213610208872551,"score_gpt":0.2743313331835174,"score_spread":0.2621952310947919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}